Paul Lismore

THE INHUMANE BEHAVIOUR OF A SADIST TEKWA FACE ARSEHOLE ENJOYING THE SCANDALOUS IMPUNITY PROVIDED BY POLITICIANS OF ALL PARTIES...AND WHO IS USING THE PAKISTANI CHIEF OF OUR MRA TO HARASS AND TORMENT ONE ELDERLY LADY, AFTER CONSPICUOUSLY FAILING TO DE

Lundi 6 Août 2018

Cowards die many times before their deaths. The valiant never taste of death but once. Julius Caesar, Act II Scene 2.


THE INHUMANE BEHAVIOUR OF A SADIST TEKWA FACE ARSEHOLE ENJOYING THE SCANDALOUS IMPUNITY PROVIDED BY POLITICIANS OF ALL PARTIES...AND WHO IS USING THE PAKISTANI CHIEF OF OUR MRA TO HARASS AND TORMENT ONE ELDERLY LADY, AFTER CONSPICUOUSLY FAILING TO DE
The above quote was written by William Shakespeare (or Sexspir, to the idiot in our National Assembly...) in 1599, and over four centuries later, it applies perfectly to our serviteurs du pays, the men and women we pay enormous salaries with outrageous perks to represent us, and who inevitably represent and obey only the views of one individual:   their party political leaders, men who have turned politics into a money making business, and who obey the diktats of the handful of individuals who control everything on this island in return for hundreds of millions of rupees as 'donations'.

They are cowards whose sense of hearing is finely attuned to any murmur of protest from the vested interests who have this island in a stranglehold but who will never, ever voice any words of protest against clear acts of bullying, harassment against the rest of us.

Let me relate to you an anecdote that describes perfectly what Sudhamo Lal, the Pakistani chief of our MRA is doing, egged on by the self confessed money launderer, Tekwa face Manraj.

The story may sound reminiscent of the oppressive or nightmarish script out of  Franz Kafka's fictional world but it did happen, with a  scene loaded with distrust and terror, where the illogical becomes plausible and brutal punishment is doled out for no known offence.

Laws and institutions, including our courts, for ordinary citizens to seek relief and remedy, have become a luxury for the few and the well connected, and an unattainable dream for the rest of us.

Abuse of these instruments by the government of the day and its little army of soucerres for targeted political vendetta is not only unconstitutional but a mockery of our right to call our island an état de droit.

One of the most brazen instances of a political vendetta was the Roosevelt Administration’s attack on Andrew Mellon, ex Secretary of State to the US Treasury.

In his autobiography, Elmer.L. Irey, Head of Criminal Division of the Treasury Tax Enforcement Branch in Washington ( 1934) acknowledged that Henry Morgenthau Jr, then Treasury Secretary, had ordered him to develop charges against Mellon even though everybody knew there was no substance.

Even the Justice department in an official document had voiced out that charges against Mellon were either invalid or could not be substantiated.

Nonetheless the Roosevelt Administration lodged tax evasion charges of about $ 1.3 million which was later scaled up to $ 3 million.Subsequently, Frank Delano Roosevelt suffered a cascade of rebuffs and a federal grand jury refused to indict any charge against Mellon.

The case then moved to the Board of Tax Appeals  in Washington.

The Board members supposedly independent, sided with the Government. However after weeks of hearings they dismissed all criminal and civil fraud charges. 

A two-year civil action beginning in 1935, dubbed the "Mellon Tax Trial", eventually exonerated Mellon, albeit several months after his death. 

The wilful destruction of BAI/Bramer will be seen soon as our own version of the Mellon Tax Trial, where illegality was given the stamp of legality simply because a few politicians in power decided that they had to obey the instructions and wishes of a handful of super rich people who did not like a non white marching into what they always perceived to be their domain : insurance and banking.

And even after they have destroyed BAI/Bramer and shared the spoils between themselves, their friends, soucerres, and shameless accuntants and zavokas, dragged the daughters of Dawood Rawat to court under charges so farcical and grotesque that no law abiding country should ever tolerate, prosecuted many innocent people in a scenario that not even Franz Kafka in one of his most febrile moods could possibly conceive, even after all that gory tale of mayhem and destruction....one little bastard with a face like an overcooked tekwa has decided that it is now the turn of the elderly wife and mother to be given a taste of his nasty, puerile, sadistic repertoire of malevolence.

Case of Mrs Ayesha Rawat = SHOOT HER AND HE WILL DIE!!

Mellon’s harassment sets the background for understanding one of the chapters of a tragedy which is by far the bloodiest of our economic and political history.

In April 2015, the government embarked on a Goebbels' type propaganda exercise based on a two syllable word which most people do not understand and which idiots have been copying as a sign of the intelligence which they think they have: PONZI.

Multi-pronged attacks were launched to neutralize Dawood Rawat, with obvious  pressure points being his family.

People who keep shouting ponzi, usually with a stupid grin, ought to bear in mind that ALL the  provisional charges against the Rawat family and the handpicked associates and staff of BAI/Bramer (not the soucerres a la sauce Beebeejaun, of course who have never been bothered...) have been thrown out by the courts.

Tekwa face has decided that it is now the turn of the Mauritius Revenue Authority to twist the bleeding arm.

Back in August 2015 a vast series of enquiries were initiated by the Director General of the Mauritius Revenue Authority, Sudhamo Lal, who once stood for candidate in the Sindh State elections in Pakistan before he was inflicted upon us.

The ongoing charade against Ayesha Rawat is one of those cases which will be remembered for long, and has the potential to become a landmark case study where a little, unelected bastard enjoying his close relationship with the politicians feels he can do what he wants with impunity.

A quick search has allowed me to explain how the latest Kafkaesque sequence unfolds:

In August 2015 the MRA initiated an investigation into the tax affairs of Mrs. Ayesha Rawat,  for income tax and VAT in respect of ONLY these years of assessment, 2012 to 2015 and taxable period ONLY between January 2011 to December 2014.

As the investigation proceeded, MRA received information from an external source (one of those shameless soucerres that tragically form part of our Mauritian landscape..) stating “Mrs Rawat had  acquired immovable property on 22 September 2004 for a total amount of EURO 1,095,052 in France while total net income declared by Applicant in her returns of income during the past five years prior to acquisition amounted to only Rs.5,805,976.”

Subsequently on  13 November 2015, MRA requested Mrs Rawat to give information concerning the said acquisition.

To which by means of letter dated 27 November 2015, Mrs Rawat rightfully refused to give such information as it is outside the period under examination, hence the period concerned is time barred.  

Remember, the initial investigation relating to income tax in respect of years of assessment was for the period January 2011 to December 2014.

So, why suddenly shift it to the acquisition of a property in a foreign country  in 2004?

In 2004 Mrs Rawat had no obligation to disclose her source of revenue overseas nor did she have to justify to the Mauritian Authorities the purchase of a foreign property.

All decent, objective Mauritians will view this as nothing but harassment, and yet another chapter in the scandalous history of vindictiveness and callousness towards one family.

And the questions that should automatically arise, in terms of fairness and fiscal independence, is this:

Will the Pakistani Sudhamo Lal now ask every Mauritian whether they have bought properties abroad?

If so, when? How much did they pay and their salary in the 5 years the purchase?

Will he ask the hundreds of Mauritian owners of IRS villas/Smart city, luxury canpmans all costing a lot more than the 1 million Euros spent by Mrs Rawat to justify their assets and their salaries at the time of purchase?

If the Ayatollah Mouftah Besharam can bag Rs 48 millions for selling the lease on OUR land, if Vishnu Lutchmeenaraidoo did the same thing some years ago and obtained yet another fortune, why hasn't Pakistani Lal asked for disclosure...if he needs information on Wilko's stroke of 'fortune', he can consult the post I wrote about his rather small income at that time....

Will he ask ALL our politicians to disclose the value of their properties abroad, and how they were purchased, and their hidden bank accounts in Singapore, Dubai, Hong Kong, etc?

Will he ask the banker who bought a property in Portugal via Sobrinho which allowed him to obtain Portuguese residency?

Will the MRA investigate all those with massive accounts as evidenced by SwissLeaks, the Panama Papers, etc?

Will Sudhamo Lal, with his degree in Soil Science & Agri Economics from Pakistan, dig into the financial affairs of his close Sindhi friends, Tulsidas, Hassamal, Kalachand, etc?

Perhaps next time he attends one of their parties, as a good agriculturalist, he ought to bring his spade and other digging implements.

The word 'hoe', a digging tool, certainly has a different, more colloquial meaning, with the unprincipled, amoral individuals in charge of our institutions....

Of course he won't.

What can you expect from a foreigner with a degree in Agriculture who suddenly finds himself in charge of our MRA?

Does it remind you of another friend of our politicians, the Indian Muni Reddy, who too had a degree in Agriculture and who was nevertheless nominated El Supremo of our State Bank of Mauritius, who at one time was on Rs100 millions+ per year + enormous perks and privileges, and who looked after our politicians and zourlanus so well that no one has ever asked any questions about his activities?

Roshi Bhadain once described the stupid Ponzi alleged against Dawood Rawat as a 'victimless crime'.

Why is his erstwhile partner in crime, Dev Manraj, now keen to turn Mrs Ayesha Rawat into a 'crimeless victim'?

I refuse to believe that Pravin Jugnauth is involved in this latest display of sadistic behaviour by the idiot with the Tekwa face who is apparently very close to the Jugs....not surprising really, because chameleon like, Tekwa changes colour whenever the opportunity arises.

He was close to Berenger when the latter was Finance minister and Prime Minister.

He was very close to Navin Ramgoolam when he was PM. Since December 2014, the Tekwa had gonfler sufficiently to embrace Roshi Bhadain when the latter was the best thing since sliced bread, but once he was discarded, Tekwa zoomed in on the Jugs.

And now he apparently has the ears of Pravin Jugnauth, and cruel tongues say that PJ's balls rest in the hands of that repulsive individual too...

If Pravin Jugnauth had any sense, he would take a huge knife and degonfler the Tekwa as soon as possible.

He must surely know that if there is one thing Mauritians of all ethnic denominations absolutely abhor, it is the gross, malicious evil abuse of power by a jumped up little bastard. 

Turning Mrs Ayesha Rawat into a martyr will be the real coup de grâce for this government, and the next election results will then be too late to convince Pravin Jugnauth  that Mauritians pa kontan kan fer dominer avek personne, sirtou kan in fini kokin tou so zafer et in fer tou pou detruire so mari et so 2 tifi...

Rédigé par Paul Lismore le Lundi 6 Août 2018

Nouveau commentaire :

Règles communautaires

Nous rappelons qu’aucun commentaire profane, raciste, sexiste, homophobe, obscène, relatif à l’intolérance religieuse, à la haine ou comportant des propos incendiaires ne sera toléré. Le droit à la liberté d’expression est important, mais il doit être exercé dans les limites légales de la discussion. Tout commentaire qui ne respecte pas ces critères sera supprimé sans préavis.